Paradigm

Steven Velasquez
G. Holmes Braddock

I'm an alumnus of the the Speech and Debate Association who previously focused on publicly addressed events specifically Original Oratory. I have dabbled with Student Congress for two years regarding debate events.

My judging style is adaptable however there are key points that I will be considering when evaluating a round. These key points are:

- Speed and Clarity

I am fine with spreading as long as it's understandable. If I can not understand your argument, then I will miss key points in the argument that may cost you a point

- Evidence vs Analysis

I prefer well-explained analytical arguments over card dumping without a warrant.

- Argument = Style

Both logical, well-developed arguments and effective, persuasive delivery are considered when making a decision.

I expect professionalism and respect from in-round conduct. Intense rounds are appreciated; however, disrespect, hostility, or general contempt will be reflected in speaker points if it arise during the round.